CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5–S1: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Sun-Joon Yoo, Kyung-Hyun Kim, Dong-Kyu Chin, Keun-Su Kim, Yong-Eun Cho, Jeong-Yoon Park
J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2022;7(1):37-45.   Published online 2022 April 28
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2022.00472

Excel Download

Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5–S1: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique. 2022;7(1):37-45   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
World Neurosurgery. 2022;157:e111-e122   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Full-endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Tubular Retractor System: A Retrospective Controlled Study
World Neurosurgery. 2022;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Neurosurgery. 2018;83(4):827-834   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

WITHDRAWN: Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Symptomatic L5–S1 Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective, Multi-Institutional Comparative Effectiveness Study
World Neurosurgery. 2015;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5
World Neurosurgery. 2022;158:e10-e18   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study
World Neurosurgery. 2020;144:e475-e482   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Erratum to “Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5” [World Neurosurgery 158 (2021) e10-e18]
World Neurosurgery. 2022;162:211   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The effect of two surgical approach Lordosis correction in degenerative lumbar diseases: minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
. 2020;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5–S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position
World Neurosurgery. 2022;162:e416-e426   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2